tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post6099868115547317064..comments2023-10-28T04:06:59.629-05:00Comments on Plaisted Writes: The Company They KeepMike Plaistedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18184502941014520240noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-60724189984389283922009-11-06T10:17:29.346-06:002009-11-06T10:17:29.346-06:00Anon...you should know by now that a Democrat atte...Anon...you should know by now that a Democrat attending a church run by a controversial character for 20 years pales in comparison to a Republican going to a luncheon sponsored by, what Mike calls, a controversial group.<br /><br />Okay, that was tongue in cheek, but Anon, you won't get a straight answer from Mike because their is no comparison in his mind. Hatred against white people is not racist, it is deserved. So, Anon, if you're white, Mike wants you to just shut up and take it. That's the real difference between "associating" and "associating."Roland Melnickhttp://badgerblogger.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-42621577143456312582009-11-06T10:08:04.203-06:002009-11-06T10:08:04.203-06:00@Anonymous...this is really about wading through t...@Anonymous...this is really about wading through the guilt-by-association despite how deliciously hypocritical Mike is being about that. You have to understand what Mike is really about.<br /><br />Mike, as usual, maintains a narrow-minded view when it comes to examining this "issue." He could easily have talked about how Obama recently dictated to the various TV talk shows when he would appear on their shows to stump for his own political agenda. But, Mike doesn't really have an issue with politicians making media appearances in general, he is only interested attacking talk radio.<br /><br />This isn't an intellectual exercise. He is acting as a political strategist. The mission is to silence talk radio or force radio stations to put liberal talkers on. The Fairness Doctrine is dead (for now anyway), so Mike needs a new strategy. His final paragraph hints at the new strategy: Government should control talk radio content because it is an "in-kind political contribution." I've surfed Mike's blog for a while now. While his arguments against talk radio have come from different angles, the goal remains the same.Roland Melnickhttp://badgerblogger.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-67194929612105493862009-11-03T22:28:09.655-06:002009-11-03T22:28:09.655-06:00Virginia and New Jersey elect Republicans, Virgini...Virginia and New Jersey elect Republicans, Virginia no surprise. New Jersey? Mikey the Republican onslaught begins!! Reid saying socialized medicine won't even get a vote this year. It will never happen in 2010 an election year, as it will embolden Conservative democrats to just say no to the obamination. in 2010 85 seats will go to Republicans, affectively ending any hope and change the obamination will try to jamm down the throats of americans. Guess us Republicans are just rising from the ashes.lmaoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-25682103724627020992009-10-29T11:09:26.329-05:002009-10-29T11:09:26.329-05:00Hi Mike.Hi Mike.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-66379757808418963292009-10-20T09:31:29.707-05:002009-10-20T09:31:29.707-05:00The issue is that you want Belling, Sykes, and Har...The issue is that you want Belling, Sykes, and Harris off the air because it's not "fair" that they get ratings and your liberal counterparts, whom have tried and failed, don't. Since when have Belling or Sykes claimed to be 'independent?' They wear their political affiliation on their sleeve, you know what you're gettign when you listen to them. Belling rarely endorses candidates and Charlie is fairly obviously in the Walker camp...again, so what?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-62688924443786156842009-10-19T23:27:14.256-05:002009-10-19T23:27:14.256-05:00How Sykes and Belling and the rest of the wingnuts...How Sykes and Belling and the rest of the wingnuts campaign "on their own" (Hah. The idea that these people are independent is hilarious) on the public, government-regulated airwaves is one thing, I suppose. Freedom of speech (only for them), they call it, although no one with any sense can get a word in edgewise.<br /><br />But most of the love-making with Walker -- when they are not reading his e-mails verbatim -- is done with him in the studio or on the phone with them on the air. So what they say in the erotic anticipation before he gets there and the afterglow after he's gone is not really the issue, is it?Mike Plaistedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18184502941014520240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-17351954541857969052009-10-19T19:16:42.399-05:002009-10-19T19:16:42.399-05:00So Walker ought to tell Belling and Sykes to quit ...So Walker ought to tell Belling and Sykes to quit saying anything about him on-air? I'm sure you'd be fine if Belling and Sykes only said bad things about him. You sleigh me Mike, you really do. Wow.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-45924869543119535252009-10-15T21:56:31.580-05:002009-10-15T21:56:31.580-05:00No, simply "agreeing" to go on a radio s...No, simply "agreeing" to go on a radio show doesn't mean that. <br /><br />However, accepting daily wet blowjobs from every wingnut under the sun, as Walker does, signifies a sufficent commitment to the agenda of those buffoons -- and they to yours -- such that a certain unity of purpose and harmony of disposition can and should be assigned.Mike Plaistedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18184502941014520240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-74168244225065427782009-10-15T17:16:32.602-05:002009-10-15T17:16:32.602-05:00So agreeing to go on a radio show means that you&#...So agreeing to go on a radio show means that you're completely in bed with the host of that show whether he/she shares the same beliefs or not?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-41180649110975360332009-10-15T12:29:41.865-05:002009-10-15T12:29:41.865-05:00Love that last line! Keep it up Plaisted!Love that last line! Keep it up Plaisted!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619571757825615442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-18792543471224137512009-10-15T07:03:37.075-05:002009-10-15T07:03:37.075-05:00You know, I was going to include a preemptive stri...You know, I was going to include a preemptive strike on this kind of drearyly predictable comeback in the post. Right-wingers never deal with the substance of an issue. They always deflect to their tiresome talking-points.<br /><br />There is a difference between "associating" and "associating". If Obama got up with Rev. Wright in the pulpit and joined in the supposedly offensive hyperbole (not to me) and used such an appearance to advance his political career, then you might have something. If he did more with Ayers than being in the same room with him during a couple of board meetings and used a meeting of the Still Terrorist Club to endorse their existance and promote himself, we could talk about that.<br /><br />But he didn't and wouldn't. Scott Walker uses wingnuts and racists like Belling and Sykes as an integral part of his political strategy. He is not only in bed with them, he happily serves them breakfast in bed after long nights of passionate political lovemaking. <br /><br />There is no comparison.Mike Plaistedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18184502941014520240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20755638.post-26347470063022283412009-10-14T08:01:04.682-05:002009-10-14T08:01:04.682-05:00Then why didn't you care that Obama hung out w...Then why didn't you care that Obama hung out with a domestic terrorist and sat in the pews while listening to a racist spew hate toward whites and America?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com